Substantiated findings
LLM’s are great at organizing narratives and findings. It's helpful to see the sources that support these conclusions, making it easier to understand the analysis and where it comes from.
When reviewing findings, I want to see the supporting sources, so I can understand and trust the conclusions more easily, and see how ideas are substantiated.
- Comparing Similarity in Source Materials: Seeing a collection of similar information helps you compare similarity between the source materials.
- Building Trust through Access to Original Sources: Access to original sources builds trust in the findings, as users can review and understand the basis of the conclusions.
More of the Witlist
Proactive agents can autonomously initiate conversations and actions based on previous interactions and context providing timely and relevant assistance.
Referencing nested data from your database in the form of tags can simplify the creation of elaborate prompt formulas.
In Arc, a playful pinch interaction lets you quickly distill any webpage into a brief summary, capturing the essence of the content in moments.
Using the source input as ground truth will help trust the system and makes it easy to interpret its process and what might have gone wrong.
When an observation is added to the context from an implicit action and a prediction is made, users should be able to easily evaluate and dismiss it.
Starting with a blank canvas can be intimidating, but providing prompt starters can help individuals overcome this initial hurdle and jumpstart their creativity.